DHS Diecast Discussion Forum
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Members | Log In

Anyone have some info on this dozer? Options · View
W900L
Posted: Thursday, July 01, 2010 11:56:22 PM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/2/2007
Posts: 154
Location: Batavia,il
One the guys I worked with at Catom found this old Terex dozer while snowmobling last winter in the UP of Wisconsin. He went back this spring and took some pics of it. Does anyone know anything about it?











ac170
Posted: Friday, July 02, 2010 12:11:54 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/20/2002
Posts: 152
Location: State College, PA
Here's a video of one at work...
Sounds nice X2


Terex 82-80 video
JTL
Posted: Friday, July 02, 2010 12:55:23 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 9/14/2007
Posts: 665
Location: North Idaho
Its big and green and makes way too much noise. Kinda like my ex-girlfriend

Are you an enviromentist, or do you work for a living?
jdofmemi
Posted: Friday, July 02, 2010 1:02:40 AM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 3/14/2006
Posts: 753
Location: Southern California
I'd say judjung from the background, as well as the limited number of 82-80's, that the video is the same one as the pictures.

That is a good find for the Terex / Euc lovers

Love to hear the twin screamin jimmies, but would not want to listen to them all day every day.

Jerry
DC Craneman
Posted: Friday, July 02, 2010 10:09:00 AM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 3/23/2010
Posts: 701
Location: Washington, DC
I am not sure that we have the model number right as it looks more like and 80 than an 82 on the lead numbers of the plate. It is an old Euclid dozer from the GM era of Euclid ownership. These used Detroit diesels and yes screamed and often leaked oil. This machine is prior to GM's dividing Euclid into Euclid and Terex and selling Euclid due to anti-trust issues. Hence a bit later you will see the same machine in the same color built by Terex.

Both halfs have since wound through various ownerships and bankruptcies to get to todays Hitachi-Euclid pairing and today's Terex but the dozers pretty well died after the IBH (?) of Germany era on the Terex side. The Euclid side stayed more with the off-road truck business. Hard to believe that the legal issue was control by GM of the truck markets.
dain555
Posted: Friday, July 02, 2010 11:18:34 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/5/2007
Posts: 2,774
Location: Sarasota, Florida, USA
DC, that does say 82-80 DA on the plate!!!

W900L, very sweet find, nice looking old girl as I haven't seen the old Euc/Terex machines in a long time!!!!

Dain

I'm a kid at heart, so I will play with any model construction vehicle from 1:87 scale to 1:1 scale!!!!

Age is a state of time NOT a state of mind!!
Basketball Man
Posted: Friday, July 02, 2010 11:45:00 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/30/2008
Posts: 3,439
Location: Good ol' Indiana
Those old green beasts are one of the few machines with the radiator in the rear.

-Ethan
Collection 8/2/2016
For more of the Diorama and my collection: On Facebook or On YouTube
jdofmemi
Posted: Friday, July 02, 2010 5:06:22 PM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 3/14/2006
Posts: 753
Location: Southern California
Definately an 82 on the tag
Terex model numbers for the dozers were 82-30, 82-40, 82-50, and the largest, what we have here, the 82-80

I could be wrong on this part, but I think the second number relates to the weight in US tons. I ran an 82-50 for a while, and recall it being comparable with a D-9H at around 50 ton, and the 82-40 compares with a D-8K at around 40 ton. 82-30 compared to the D-7G at around 30 ton. There may be an 82-20, I don't recall. I would have to get the book out to confirm this.

Jerry
ulf
Posted: Friday, July 02, 2010 5:50:41 PM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 2/8/2008
Posts: 4,174
Location: Anchorage, AK
The dual engine theme in that era of Euclids (both dozers and trucks) always was an interesting solution to up the power output. Think
Greasemonkey
Posted: Friday, July 02, 2010 7:45:55 PM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/27/2007
Posts: 2,647
Location: Fort McMurray, Alberta
DC Craneman,

This is in fact a Terex version which was called the 82-80. Before the sell off of Euclid, the Terex division did not exist. Therefore, the machine in question would not have Terex builders plates on it, but it would have Euclid plates instead. The Euclid version was the TC-12. This is clearly an 82-80.

Brian
W900L
Posted: Friday, July 02, 2010 7:59:06 PM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/2/2007
Posts: 154
Location: Batavia,il
Thanks for help guys on getting me some info on the old Terex. I will pass it along.
Thanks again ,Tom
W900L
Posted: Saturday, July 03, 2010 12:30:34 PM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/2/2007
Posts: 154
Location: Batavia,il
Does anyone know how they hauled it? Did they split it in half?
DC Craneman
Posted: Saturday, July 03, 2010 2:01:04 PM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 3/23/2010
Posts: 701
Location: Washington, DC
I am going to stand corrected as yes this is the Terex era. Thank you. That places it in the 1968 to 1981 window or the 1983 to 1986 window.

General Motors due to concentration of its ownership of the truck markets was forced to exit the heavy off-road truck markets in 1968. That was the Euclid sale and the remainder being named Terex. In 1981 it sold Terex except for the Scotland operation to IBH. IBH went bankrupt in 1983 when thru I believe union pressure and secured debt it received Terex out of the IBM Bankruptcy. In 1986 it sold Terex to Northwest (of crane fame). Northwest which was within months of bankruptcy itself in 1983 was purchased by Randolph W. Lentz. Lentz quickly made his purchased price back by ceasing production and building only parts. In 1984 her acquired Terex (Scotland). When he through Northwest acquired the GM piece, he had put it all back together and had Terex assume the lead name position and made Northwest the subsidiary.

For the crane folks, in March 1985, Northwest acquired the Bucyrus Erie construction products operations which had ceased manufacturing in 1983. He revived the Dynahoe operations of BCP but otherwise again kept the parts operations.

In 1988 the Koering (and Lorain) business was acquired as well.

This was a highly leveraged accumulation of the remants of our once proud construction equipment manufacturing sector.

dain555
Posted: Saturday, July 03, 2010 6:03:53 PM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/5/2007
Posts: 2,774
Location: Sarasota, Florida, USA
W900L, they used to haul them on regular lowboys around where I lived ( A couple of construction companies had these up in central NY State). The Bero company was one of those few companies and I believe they used something like the WC22 White and a Rogers trailer, they also had some heavier trucks they used to haul their concrete pavers on!!!

Oh and no they would not be able to split it in two for transport!!

Oh and by the way these concrete pavers were the kind that had dump trucks bring in the dry materials and it would mix and place the concrete as it went down the prepared area for paving!! It used a shuttle bucket type of device to move the mixed concrete from the mixer to where it was placed, it ran on a I-beam track about 10-20 feet from main mix area!!

Wish I could find pics!!!

Dain

I'm a kid at heart, so I will play with any model construction vehicle from 1:87 scale to 1:1 scale!!!!

Age is a state of time NOT a state of mind!!
W900L
Posted: Saturday, July 03, 2010 10:28:06 PM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/2/2007
Posts: 154
Location: Batavia,il
Thanks for the help guys. I wasn't sure how wide the tracks were didn't know if you would put on a beam or if it would fit on a 8'6" or 9' wide trailer with outrigger boards.
Shaunrh 2311
Posted: Saturday, July 03, 2010 10:57:57 PM

Rank: Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 9/29/2006
Posts: 90
Location: Perth Western Australia
W900L,
Is there any chance you could get some pics of the hosing and how the 2 cylinders are connected for the hydraulics.I am helping a guy put one together here in Australia and the hydraulic plumbing for the blade cyls is a mystery.Many thanks if you are able to help.

Shaun
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

SoClean Theme Created by Jaben Cargman (Tiny Gecko)
Powered by Yet Another Forum.net version 1.9.1.8 (NET v2.0) - 3/29/2008
Copyright © 2003-2008 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.