|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 1/2/2007 Posts: 154 Location: Batavia,il
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 12/20/2002 Posts: 152 Location: State College, PA
|
Here's a video of one at work... Sounds nice X2 Terex 82-80 video
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 9/14/2007 Posts: 665 Location: North Idaho
|
Its big and green and makes way too much noise. Kinda like my ex-girlfriend
Are you an enviromentist, or do you work for a living?
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 3/14/2006 Posts: 753 Location: Southern California
|
I'd say judjung from the background, as well as the limited number of 82-80's, that the video is the same one as the pictures.
That is a good find for the Terex / Euc lovers
Love to hear the twin screamin jimmies, but would not want to listen to them all day every day.
Jerry
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 3/23/2010 Posts: 701 Location: Washington, DC
|
I am not sure that we have the model number right as it looks more like and 80 than an 82 on the lead numbers of the plate. It is an old Euclid dozer from the GM era of Euclid ownership. These used Detroit diesels and yes screamed and often leaked oil. This machine is prior to GM's dividing Euclid into Euclid and Terex and selling Euclid due to anti-trust issues. Hence a bit later you will see the same machine in the same color built by Terex.
Both halfs have since wound through various ownerships and bankruptcies to get to todays Hitachi-Euclid pairing and today's Terex but the dozers pretty well died after the IBH (?) of Germany era on the Terex side. The Euclid side stayed more with the off-road truck business. Hard to believe that the legal issue was control by GM of the truck markets.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 6/5/2007 Posts: 2,774 Location: Sarasota, Florida, USA
|
DC, that does say 82-80 DA on the plate!!!
W900L, very sweet find, nice looking old girl as I haven't seen the old Euc/Terex machines in a long time!!!!
Dain
I'm a kid at heart, so I will play with any model construction vehicle from 1:87 scale to 1:1 scale!!!!
Age is a state of time NOT a state of mind!!
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 12/30/2008 Posts: 3,439 Location: Good ol' Indiana
|
Those old green beasts are one of the few machines with the radiator in the rear.
-Ethan Collection 8/2/2016For more of the Diorama and my collection: On Facebook or On YouTube
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 3/14/2006 Posts: 753 Location: Southern California
|
Definately an 82 on the tag Terex model numbers for the dozers were 82-30, 82-40, 82-50, and the largest, what we have here, the 82-80
I could be wrong on this part, but I think the second number relates to the weight in US tons. I ran an 82-50 for a while, and recall it being comparable with a D-9H at around 50 ton, and the 82-40 compares with a D-8K at around 40 ton. 82-30 compared to the D-7G at around 30 ton. There may be an 82-20, I don't recall. I would have to get the book out to confirm this.
Jerry
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 2/8/2008 Posts: 4,174 Location: Anchorage, AK
|
The dual engine theme in that era of Euclids (both dozers and trucks) always was an interesting solution to up the power output.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 6/27/2007 Posts: 2,647 Location: Fort McMurray, Alberta
|
DC Craneman,
This is in fact a Terex version which was called the 82-80. Before the sell off of Euclid, the Terex division did not exist. Therefore, the machine in question would not have Terex builders plates on it, but it would have Euclid plates instead. The Euclid version was the TC-12. This is clearly an 82-80.
Brian
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 1/2/2007 Posts: 154 Location: Batavia,il
|
Thanks for help guys on getting me some info on the old Terex. I will pass it along. Thanks again ,Tom
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 1/2/2007 Posts: 154 Location: Batavia,il
|
Does anyone know how they hauled it? Did they split it in half?
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 3/23/2010 Posts: 701 Location: Washington, DC
|
I am going to stand corrected as yes this is the Terex era. Thank you. That places it in the 1968 to 1981 window or the 1983 to 1986 window.
General Motors due to concentration of its ownership of the truck markets was forced to exit the heavy off-road truck markets in 1968. That was the Euclid sale and the remainder being named Terex. In 1981 it sold Terex except for the Scotland operation to IBH. IBH went bankrupt in 1983 when thru I believe union pressure and secured debt it received Terex out of the IBM Bankruptcy. In 1986 it sold Terex to Northwest (of crane fame). Northwest which was within months of bankruptcy itself in 1983 was purchased by Randolph W. Lentz. Lentz quickly made his purchased price back by ceasing production and building only parts. In 1984 her acquired Terex (Scotland). When he through Northwest acquired the GM piece, he had put it all back together and had Terex assume the lead name position and made Northwest the subsidiary.
For the crane folks, in March 1985, Northwest acquired the Bucyrus Erie construction products operations which had ceased manufacturing in 1983. He revived the Dynahoe operations of BCP but otherwise again kept the parts operations.
In 1988 the Koering (and Lorain) business was acquired as well.
This was a highly leveraged accumulation of the remants of our once proud construction equipment manufacturing sector.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 6/5/2007 Posts: 2,774 Location: Sarasota, Florida, USA
|
W900L, they used to haul them on regular lowboys around where I lived ( A couple of construction companies had these up in central NY State). The Bero company was one of those few companies and I believe they used something like the WC22 White and a Rogers trailer, they also had some heavier trucks they used to haul their concrete pavers on!!!
Oh and no they would not be able to split it in two for transport!!
Oh and by the way these concrete pavers were the kind that had dump trucks bring in the dry materials and it would mix and place the concrete as it went down the prepared area for paving!! It used a shuttle bucket type of device to move the mixed concrete from the mixer to where it was placed, it ran on a I-beam track about 10-20 feet from main mix area!!
Wish I could find pics!!!
Dain
I'm a kid at heart, so I will play with any model construction vehicle from 1:87 scale to 1:1 scale!!!!
Age is a state of time NOT a state of mind!!
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 1/2/2007 Posts: 154 Location: Batavia,il
|
Thanks for the help guys. I wasn't sure how wide the tracks were didn't know if you would put on a beam or if it would fit on a 8'6" or 9' wide trailer with outrigger boards.
|
|
Rank: Member Groups: Member
Joined: 9/29/2006 Posts: 90 Location: Perth Western Australia
|
W900L, Is there any chance you could get some pics of the hosing and how the 2 cylinders are connected for the hydraulics.I am helping a guy put one together here in Australia and the hydraulic plumbing for the blade cyls is a mystery.Many thanks if you are able to help.
Shaun
|
|
Guest |