DHS Diecast Discussion Forum
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Members | Log In

1:1 Mammoet LTM 11200-9.1 *Pic Heavy* Options · View
Robert Heuston
Posted: Saturday, February 05, 2011 4:20:13 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/23/2010
Posts: 1,734
Location: Hunter Valley
Don't these crane have hydralic luff on the windmill tip?
DeWoc19
Posted: Saturday, February 05, 2011 4:22:37 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 10/2/2007
Posts: 5,966
yes, why?
Robert Heuston
Posted: Saturday, February 05, 2011 4:24:23 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/23/2010
Posts: 1,734
Location: Hunter Valley
From the pics I've been seeing in this tread it's 3 position manual set position
DeWoc19
Posted: Saturday, February 05, 2011 4:25:56 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 10/2/2007
Posts: 5,966
yeah i see where you are talking about..... should be a hydraulic offset though

EDIT: looks like the PDF for 112 hydraulic jib might be an option, but maybe im not understand it correctly
birdman
Posted: Thursday, February 17, 2011 12:10:28 PM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 8/9/2005
Posts: 1,234
Location: Lancashire England
Hi Guys,

At the start of this post there were a few pictures showing a Cat tracked loader helping the guys out from Mammoet, well one good turn deserves another, here is a report from this months Cranes Today mag as follows:

Ainscough rescues Cat from river

12 January 2011

A Caterpillar wheel-loader was retrieved from the River Tyne by Ainscough Crane Hire after vandals broke into a concrete production depot and stole the machine.

Joyriders used the Caterpillar 926 wheel-loader to destroy a fence bordering the river before driving it into the Tyne.

Ainscough brought in a Terex Demag AC350/6 mobile crane a few days after local transport company Albany Motors had secured the loader to begin the retrieval operation.

Contract lift manager Gary Davies was responsible for inspecting the site before planning the lift for Ainscough.

As the 22t loader was partially submerged in the Tyne there were some difficulties in slinging the load, Davies explained.

“When I went [to inspect the site] it was a higher tide than when we went back to do the job. We had a couple of hours when it was advised that we do it because of the low tide, but approximately just under half of it was submerged.”

This also meant that not all of the lifting points on the Caterpillar were accessible, resulting in a last minute change to the method statement to allow for a two-point lift instead of the four-point lift Davies was expecting.

“The [loader] was about 22t and was within a 26m radius, but I added a couple of metres extra just as a bit of an extra safety factor, and obviously a little bit more for the water. The crane at that radius is good for just shy of 30t, that was on full counterweight.”

The AC350/6 used featured a 40.7m boom and was used with its full complement of counterweight of 116.7t.


Sorry that there are no pictures may be someone has some, anyone you know Gaz, could they help out.

Steve.
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

SoClean Theme Created by Jaben Cargman (Tiny Gecko)
Powered by Yet Another Forum.net version 1.9.1.8 (NET v2.0) - 3/29/2008
Copyright © 2003-2008 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.