DHS Diecast Discussion Forum
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Members | Log In

The Caterpillar 793 Mining Truck Options · View
Chris53
Posted: Saturday, April 09, 2011 2:45:56 AM

Rank: Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 2/1/2011
Posts: 62
Location: Sydney, Australia
THE CATERPILLAR 793 MINING TRUCK

Many collectors will be familiar with Norscots model of the Caterpillar 793 Mining Truck; the latest variant of which, the 793F, was released at this years Toy Fair. Incidentally, the model displayed at Toy Fair was from the initial production run which included a manufacturing fault; the model identification decal was incorrectly positioned on the tipper body.

"/>
CAT 793F on display at Toy Fair 2011 (Cranes Etc, 2011)

The 793 was released by Norscot in 2006 as a ‘D’ variant, with Performance Plus Body, sometimes referred to as the ‘Collectors Version’. This was subsequently followed up in 2007 with a 793D in Caterpillar’s new Power Edge Trade Dress and MSD II (mine specific design) Body. The final variant, the 793F with X Body, was formally released at Toy Fair this year.

The following is a review of the 793 across the three variants offered by Norscot over the past five years.

Caterpillar 793D with Performance Plus Body

The Performance Plus Body was scheduled for commercial released in late 2005, but never made it onto the market. The theory behind the ‘waffle’ design was to significantly reduce the body weight whilst maintaining stiffness and durability. Performance improvements included:

A grid design that evenly spread stresses whilst reducing flexure and cracking. The lightweight grid inserts decreased vehicle operating weight by eliminating material that would normally accumulate within the grids.

The body featured an S-shaped canopy-front wall-floor transition that spread stress over a larger area, effectively reducing stress concentrations. The S-shaped front of the body was conducive to free material flow, faster material movement out of the body, and less material sticking.

Composite materials were incorporated into the design, including fibreglass canopy sections that were lighter than steel. The substructure was a composed of fibreglass beams and UHMW (ultra high molecular weight) plastic overlay sheeting.

The body had a 4° flare from front to back, with side walls that tipped out, offering a larger shovel target area and less resistance to material flow when dumping.

"/>
Performance Plus Body as shown at MINExpo (taken from internet, unknown source)

Miniature Construction World reviewed Norscots adaptation of the early 793D in 2006 and the review can be found here:
CAT 793D Performance Plus Review

Whilst the review generally praised the level of detail on the model, it failed to mention the omission of a motor in the truck. In fact not only was the motor missing, but also the transmission, drive shaft and most of the differential or final drives.

"/>

"/>

"/>

Caterpillar 793D with MSD II Body

My understanding is that the MSD II Body was under development at the same time as the Performance Plus Body, but ultimately won out due to the lower production cost. Moreover, the MSD II was part of a broader strategy by Caterpillar to give customers greater customisability at the point of manufacture.

The configuration of the MSD II Body is based on the evaluated parameters of a specific mine site, including material density, material abrasiveness, impact potential, type of loading tool, haul road conditions and conditions at the loading and dumping sites. The MSD II Body is tailored to yield the best balance of payload capacity and durability when working at established mine sites, where material density is likely to be consistent.

The 793D with MSD II Body modelled by Norscot was released in Caterpillar’s new ‘Power Edge’ livery, which saw the replacement of the familiar red beltline stripe graphics first introduced in 1991/92. A new more vibrant yellow accompanied new graphics, and the new look was extended across the entire Caterpillar range to enhance product identity.

As with the earlier 793D variant, Miniature Construction World reviewed this updated release, and this can be found here:
CAT 793D MSD II Review

Apart from the body change the model remained exactly the same, even to the extent of omitting a motor, transmission, drive shaft and half the differential. Both this and the previous variant had good levels of detail, for the most part, due to the use of moulded plastic parts.

"/>

"/>

"/>


DSCN1016 by Chris_53, on Flickr"/>

Caterpillar 793F with X Body

In 2009 Caterpillar released the X Body, designed to offer increased payload, improved durability and extended service life. According to Caterpillar, the X Body featured a high strength but lightweight design that made it ideal for high density, poorly fragmented, materials.

The X Body design improvements included a more robust frame structure and tapered sidewall ribs, aligned with floor ribs to add to the structural integrity of the body. It used a particularly heavy-duty design and accommodated a larger volume than previous Cat dual-slope or flat-floor bodies.

Norscot most recent variant of the 793, the latest ‘F’ Series, features Caterpillar’s X Body. This model has as yet not been reviewed by either Miniature Construction World or Cranes ETC, so I will attempt to provide a brief rundown.

"/>

The upgraded F model features a less cluttered cab deck layout, gone are the air tank and ancillary equipment, replaced with a couple of extinguishers. The deck also features a lift-up panel (similar to the 797F) to access the engine compartment, and euphoria; there is actually an engine under there. Also at the cab deck level are two large exhaust, nice patterned no-slip decking and metal handrails.

"/>

"/>

The F Series has a new drivers cab, but unlike the cab on the flagship 797F, there are no lifting lugs on the cab roof. There is an access ladder from the cab deck to the rear of the engine bay.

With the inclusion of an engine and torque converter, additional effort was made to complete the drive train, including a transmission and complete final drives. However, things move slowly at Norscot as a vital component in the motive system is still omitted...no driveshaft. Oh, well maybe on the 793G...or the H...or the... Think

"/>

The 793F has operable steering complete with steering dampers and increased range of motion over previous variants. The rear suspension has been modelled as it was on previous versions, and works reasonably well.

The X Body includes debris bars and some really nice safety cables designed for locking the body in the upright position, although this is not actually possible on the model. The body includes wear plates and is fitted with multi-stage pistons that do a great job of keeping the body in the raised position.

All in all the 793F is a nice model with a reasonable level of detailing. Where plastic parts are used they match well with the paint finish. On that topic, typical for Norscot models, the paint is both heavy and excessively glossy.

Conclusion

For anyone with a passion for dirt haulers, having all three models illustrates nicely the transition between models. It enables you to trace the evolution of not only the 793, but also Caterpillars corporate image with the Power Edge Trade Dress and the development mine truck tipping bodies.

"/>

What is needed now is for Caterpillar to authorise another truck fitted with a Gateless Coal Body; personally I think a 795F AC would be just the thing, and it would be nice to see an AC drive CAT in the lineup. Then again, with Caterpillar’s immanent takeover of Bucyrus they will inherit a fleet of AC drive trucks, so perhaps the days are numbered for the 795F AC.

Hope you found this interesting and informative. Errors and omissions excepted, if you feel something is incorrect, please let me know.

Chris
PH4100XPC@gmail.com
Brian C
Posted: Saturday, April 09, 2011 3:18:52 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 10/24/2006
Posts: 301
Location: Bunbury,W.Australia
Great post with excellent pictures! Good to see mining equipment models featured on the forum for a change......

Thanks for taking the time to compile this informative review.
Regards
Brian CCool
laurent o.e.987
Posted: Saturday, April 09, 2011 3:34:31 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/14/2010
Posts: 393
Location: ste. anne manitoba canada
i'm about to order the new 793F ... your timing was perfect ... never paid attention to the fact my older 793D doesn't have a power train ...d'oh! ... pretty lame ... oh well ... i'm a crane guy but i love Caterpillar earthmoving and mining equipment ... i feel their engines are top notch as well ... and don't forget the side-booms ... or tractors as the pipeliners call them ... thanks for the review and the pics ... never got around to buying the waffle body 793D ... kinda like the look of it ...


larryCool
Paul
Posted: Saturday, April 09, 2011 5:10:07 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 10/7/2005
Posts: 2,495
Location: Shetland
Great review and pictures - it was particularly good to see the photos showing the "missing" parts because is shows how badly it affects a model and for me no engine etc = no buy.

However, good to see that Norscot have ammended most of these issues so let's hope there are no missing engines in any future 795F....

Smile

Scania V8. The best sounding truck in the world.

CarlBrutanananadilewski
Posted: Saturday, April 09, 2011 5:26:40 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 2/26/2008
Posts: 1,765
Location: Virginia
Great post Applause Applause Applause
Cranes Etc
Posted: Saturday, April 09, 2011 6:23:59 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 8/10/2002
Posts: 1,588
Location: England
Chris53 wrote:
THE CATERPILLAR 793 MINING TRUCK


CAT 793F on display at Toy Fair 2011 (taken from internet, unknown source)



Amusing! The clue might just be in the photo.....Wink

http://www.CranesEtc.co.uk
http://www.Twitter.com/CranesEtc
http://www.YouTube.com/CranesEtcTV
Cranes Etc on Facebook
Chris53
Posted: Saturday, April 09, 2011 6:51:07 AM

Rank: Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 2/1/2011
Posts: 62
Location: Sydney, Australia
Erratum

In an unintentional oversight I used a photograph sourced on the internet without due acknowledgement to the owner.

I have contacted the owner of the first image contained in my post, Cranes Etc, and expressed my sincere apologies for not duly acknowledging the source of the photograph.

I would also like to express my regret to readers of the post for my inadvertent but stupid error.

Regards,
Chris53

Chris
PH4100XPC@gmail.com
Paul
Posted: Saturday, April 09, 2011 8:57:33 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 10/7/2005
Posts: 2,495
Location: Shetland
Hey Chris, I wouldn't be too hard on yourself Smile

I don't think Ian(Cranes Etc) was overly "offended" by the looks of it!.

Scania V8. The best sounding truck in the world.

Cranes Etc
Posted: Saturday, April 09, 2011 11:15:14 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 8/10/2002
Posts: 1,588
Location: England
Thanks Chris, and for your personal mail.

Certainly no worries on my part for this use of this image in this way, and thanks for the subsequent acknowledgement. Smile

Ian

http://www.CranesEtc.co.uk
http://www.Twitter.com/CranesEtc
http://www.YouTube.com/CranesEtcTV
Cranes Etc on Facebook
footloose52
Posted: Saturday, April 09, 2011 9:14:59 PM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/8/2005
Posts: 348
Location: Western Australia
As stated by others, great to see an acknowlegement to anyone game enough to start a Mining equipment Post,
I love it and hope to see a lot more of these start as models are produced. Mining & Construction Equipment forever.

Regards from down under
Peter
kwabbus
Posted: Monday, April 11, 2011 8:30:22 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/4/2008
Posts: 807
Location: The Netherlands
Great post!

Wouter
Chris53
Posted: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 8:43:16 PM

Rank: Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 2/1/2011
Posts: 62
Location: Sydney, Australia
An error which was preventing images from displaying seems to have been resolved.

Cheers,
Chris

Chris
PH4100XPC@gmail.com
RowanH
Posted: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 11:26:28 PM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/30/2003
Posts: 4,918
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Don't know how I missed this post the first time around. Excellent review / write up Chris. Thanks for taking the time, that was great reading. PS, I'm guessing that due to the added drive-terrain parts on the F series, that it is your favorite of the 3? Do you plan on doing anymore progressive reports like this? Do you have the 797 series in your collection? I would love to see one done on the 797 (NZG), 797B (NZG) 797F (Norscot).

Rowan.

1:25th scale CAT 375L excavator

Chris53
Posted: Thursday, April 14, 2011 7:25:51 AM

Rank: Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 2/1/2011
Posts: 62
Location: Sydney, Australia
RowanH wrote:
I'm guessing that due to the added drive-terrain parts on the F series, that it is your favorite of the 3? Do you plan on doing anymore progressive reports like this?.


Rowan,
Once adopted they are all my favourites Angel As far as these three are concerned, each has unique characteristics and I don't have a favourite.
As to the second question, I think Cranes Etc and Miniature Construction World do a fantastic job and I best leave model reviews to them. My post was more about the bodies and changes to CAT branding which is nicely reflected across these three models.
Thanks for your comments.

Cheers,
Chris

Chris
PH4100XPC@gmail.com
SJDownes
Posted: Friday, April 15, 2011 7:47:05 PM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/22/2007
Posts: 648
Location: England
I have uploaded a review of the 793F to my website for anyone interested.



Steven

Miniature Construction World on Facebook
Miniature Construction World on Twitter
sjd@miniature-construction-world.co.uk
Cranes Etc
Posted: Sunday, April 17, 2011 2:10:29 PM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 8/10/2002
Posts: 1,588
Location: England
GraniteFan713
Posted: Sunday, April 17, 2011 9:22:59 PM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 9/30/2008
Posts: 762
Location: Northeast, PA
Thanks for all the photos guys! Unfortunately, I think I'll pass on this one. The 793D looks much better IMO.

-Dave

TopGun1954
Posted: Sunday, April 17, 2011 9:31:48 PM

Rank: Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 2/4/2009
Posts: 53
Location: Englewood, OH
Cranes Etc wrote:
The review of this model is now also on Cranes Etc.

Ian




Ian:

It has been a few weeks since I have logged on to your site to look at reviews. I really like the videos that you are posting now in addition to the written review. Nice touch!

That certainly is an amazing feat of strength that worker is displaying in your reveiw of the 24M! Hard hat and safety shoes are certainly required.

Great job!

Rick
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

SoClean Theme Created by Jaben Cargman (Tiny Gecko)
Powered by Yet Another Forum.net version 1.9.1.8 (NET v2.0) - 3/29/2008
Copyright © 2003-2008 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.