DHS Diecast Discussion Forum
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Members | Log In

Caterpillar 994K announcement Options · View
4100serie
Posted: Friday, November 21, 2014 11:20:40 AM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/20/2005
Posts: 179
Location: France
The Cat 994K has just been announced, with a commercial release in the first quarter of 2016. It's not simply a new 994 version, Cat new flagship loader could have been called 995K because it is significantly greater than the current 994H : 45tons standard bucket capacity (+18%) ; 237,200 kg operating weight (+42t) ; 1847 Hp gross power (vs 1577 Hp).

http://www.mining.com/web/new-cat-994k-wheel-loader-features-increased-payload-power-and-productivity-and-lower-cost-per-ton-2/





Florian
digggerr
Posted: Friday, November 21, 2014 1:28:37 PM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 11/15/2003
Posts: 1,151
Location: North America
Very cool! Thanks for sharing with us. Maybe something for CCM's diecast line?
4100serie
Posted: Friday, November 21, 2014 3:56:58 PM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/20/2005
Posts: 179
Location: France
A video is yet available if you get the correct link :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XFgkVBe-X2Q
leo-cat
Posted: Friday, November 21, 2014 5:44:15 PM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/24/2007
Posts: 630
Location: Germany
Thanks for the heads up. I don't like the looks of it very much. The propotions just seem off.
The brochure's also already available at Cats website.

What I'm really wondering about is why it's run by a 3516E? Aren't the C175s any good?

Leo
Dex
Posted: Friday, November 21, 2014 10:00:32 PM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 9/12/2012
Posts: 485
Location: San Diego, California
Size comparison shot I swiped from the video. It's a bit bigger than the 994. I always though the big loaders looked funny because it required so much machine the move the size bucket it's given.

a Cutter
Posted: Friday, November 21, 2014 11:15:02 PM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 3/21/2006
Posts: 5,046
Location: B-town
I think Tonkin could handle this challenge. I certainly couldn't handle a CCM price tag if they produced it.
CarlBrutanananadilewski
Posted: Saturday, November 22, 2014 12:29:19 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 2/26/2008
Posts: 1,765
Location: Virginia
She got a bigger butt
rare ss
Posted: Saturday, November 22, 2014 4:39:12 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 8/27/2014
Posts: 184
Location: Perth, Australia
certainly is a jump up in size and well deserving of a "995K" sales model name IMO as it jumps ahead of the WA1200 in spec's

in other news I did hear a wild rumour of a WA1600 and even WA1800 in the works which will be something to see!
Gavin84w
Posted: Saturday, November 22, 2014 9:58:08 PM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/27/2003
Posts: 1,628
Location: Australia
Well it really needed to get in the WA1200 size to compete better, lots of lost sales to that machine so counterpunch. It looks a little odd with no front fenders like we have been used to forever and whats the bet some mine down here will have to have handrails all over the hood "cos we always have" when there is nothing to go out there and do now.
Rossco
Posted: Sunday, November 23, 2014 3:12:55 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/21/2003
Posts: 728
Gavin84w wrote:
Well it really needed to get in the WA1200 size to compete better, lots of lost sales to that machine so counterpunch. It looks a little odd with no front fenders like we have been used to forever and whats the bet some mine down here will have to have handrails all over the hood "cos we always have" when there is nothing to go out there and do now.


Yeah I didn't wanna pipe in but Gavs right (As always) the WA1200 here out performs the 994H. Well the guys loading the 'Bin' prefer the Komatsu. It even out performs the L1850 in the pit (It runs longer as well)

Cannot find much info on the 994K, C175?

Edit: Yeah no fenders. No lighting package as well. Must be a fair weather unit.
Gavin84w
Posted: Sunday, November 23, 2014 4:37:45 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/27/2003
Posts: 1,628
Location: Australia
Still has some development in front of it before commercial release so might get those things at some point Ross. The C175 never made it into it, it has a new generation 3516E series engine.
Rossco
Posted: Sunday, November 23, 2014 5:40:09 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/21/2003
Posts: 728
Gavin84w wrote:
Still has some development in front of it before commercial release so might get those things at some point Ross. The C175 never made it into it, it has a new generation 3516E series engine.


Thanks Gav.

Like you have said in the past : 3516, more of a counter weight at them power levels. Cat must have satisfied EPA enough with the very successful ACERT's to be granted more 35's.

It's shame it's a year or two behind, don't think we will see one here but the other operations might bite when it's released.

I wonder if the other 'Major players' will release another unit to try and edge this loader out some?

Haven't heard much from LeT since P&H took over mmm.
rare ss
Posted: Sunday, November 23, 2014 6:18:48 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 8/27/2014
Posts: 184
Location: Perth, Australia
I heard the only thing stopping a WA1600 and/or WA1800 is the tyres
Brian C
Posted: Sunday, November 23, 2014 9:35:08 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 10/24/2006
Posts: 301
Location: Bunbury,W.Australia
I was also surprised at the use of the 3516 power plant.Regarding tyres,the 994K prototype is using 58/85-57 tyres but there is no indication as to what the other options are, in this specalog below
http://s7d2.scene7.com/is/content/Caterpillar/C10337952.

I would assume either 60/80-57 or possibly even the 65/65-57 sizes could also be utilised on this 240 tonner.I am sure a larger loader than the WA1200-6 is possible and it shouldn't really have any engineering constraints regarding the availability of suitable size tyres. The L-2350( 270 tonne} is the only loader that currently has it's own "custom made" tyre size- the 70/70-57, which could also be utilised on a larger Komatsu loader if required.
Rossco
Posted: Sunday, November 23, 2014 9:05:42 PM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/21/2003
Posts: 728
Brian C wrote:
I was also surprised at the use of the 3516 power plant.Regarding tyres,the 994K prototype is using 58/85-57 tyres but there is no indication as to what the other options are, in this specalog below
http://s7d2.scene7.com/is/content/Caterpillar/C10337952.

I would assume either 60/80-57 or possibly even the 65/65-57 sizes could also be utilised on this 240 tonner.I am sure a larger loader than the WA1200-6 is possible and it shouldn't really have any engineering constraints regarding the availability of suitable size tyres. The L-2350( 270 tonne} is the only loader that currently has it's own "custom made" tyre size- the 70/70-57, which could also be utilised on a larger Komatsu loader if required.


The three big mechanical loaders here run the same size tire according to the KAL tire boys.

The L1850 runs a slightly wider tire with Pewag Chains allround.

Brett G
Posted: Sunday, November 23, 2014 11:43:25 PM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 11/13/2012
Posts: 1,001
Location: South oz THE ASS END OF THE MURRAY RIVER , Austral
I'd like to see the 994K with detail like the L1850

safety walk way chains
real fold down ladder as in the OP pic
fire suppression system
price range same as the L1850 was.



wheel chocks i use the triangle foam that's in the packs printer ink cartridges (paint yellow or red) work perfect Wink



.

Sent from my HTC M10 - Rooted , using S-OFF , Open Home 6 & Buuf icon packs
http://forum.xda-developers.com/ BUILD YOUR OWN PHONE

Butler
Posted: Monday, November 24, 2014 1:40:15 AM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/29/2009
Posts: 101
Location: Perth, Western Australia
About time Cat upsized the 994 to match the WA1200. The big komatsu will finally have some competition on its hands. Hopefully they make some D-lug tyres for this machine as those radials are freaking hopeless on 1850's and WA1200's.
Foofighter
Posted: Monday, November 24, 2014 5:21:56 AM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 11/14/2013
Posts: 81
Location: Ireland
I do hope we see this down the line in 1/50
FiatAllisHD41
Posted: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 12:33:29 AM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 5/27/2010
Posts: 1,905
Caterpillar 994K strutting her stuff via Cat You-Tube Channel. Cat's roll out of this massive machine. Enjoy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T80ZcYsUCNk


PDF files on Cat 994K .

http://s7d2.scene7.com/is/content/Caterpillar/C10337952
















“A tiger doesn't lose sleep over the opinion of sheep.” ― Shahir Zag

" An educated mind learns from his mistakes and corrects them. A dolt, on the other hand, lashes out and continues showing his ignorance."
-Unknown

“Two possibilities exist: either we are alone in the Universe or we are not. Both are equally terrifying.”― Arthur C. Clarke

"Anti-social behavior is a trait of intelligence in a world full of conformists" - Nikola Tesla

" If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur ". Paul Neal "Red" Adair {Wild Well Firefighter for those who live under rocks}



a Cutter
Posted: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 2:52:05 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 3/21/2006
Posts: 5,046
Location: B-town
Great video.....what a beast. I can't wait for a hopefully well executed and affordable 1/50 scale version.
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

SoClean Theme Created by Jaben Cargman (Tiny Gecko)
Powered by Yet Another Forum.net version 1.9.1.8 (NET v2.0) - 3/29/2008
Copyright © 2003-2008 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.