|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 6/30/2003
Posts: 4,918
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 8/16/2006
Posts: 295
Location: Burlington, Canada
|
Hello CCM, hurry up with the 6020B and then build this one. I'll take two.
Ross
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 2/7/2006
Posts: 143
Location: Cincinnati
|
I bet Norscot is already dusting off the molds.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 4/2/2005
Posts: 648
Location: America
|
Another photo of the same machine that was sent to me by a friend in Europe. 
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 9/13/2006
Posts: 2,508
Location: PA
|
There is (or really recently was) one near Pittsburgh for testing...
regards,
Jim
"Once again, concussion by safety" -Mike Rowe
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 10/31/2011
Posts: 1,079
Location: Springfield, Oregon
|
Seems like it would suck to load trucks on the same level with the cab that low.
-Jason YouTubeTimberline Thinning CompanyMy Photostream
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 9/13/2006
Posts: 2,508
Location: PA
|
HCF wrote:Seems like it would suck to load trucks on the same level with the cab that low. The more photos I've seen of it, the more I've realized that won't be the case. The cab is just as high as it is on a Hitachi EX1200 or Komatsu PC1250 I'm sure cab risers will be an option though.
regards, Jim "Once again, concussion by safety" -Mike Rowe
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 9/14/2007
Posts: 664
Location: North Idaho
|
HCF wrote:Seems like it would suck to load trucks on the same level with the cab that low. That's why you keep them underneath you!
Are you an enviromentist, or do you work for a living?
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 10/31/2011
Posts: 1,079
Location: Springfield, Oregon
|
JTL wrote:HCF wrote:Seems like it would suck to load trucks on the same level with the cab that low. That's why you keep them underneath you! Haha yeah that's how it should work out.
-Jason YouTubeTimberline Thinning CompanyMy Photostream
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 10/31/2011
Posts: 1,079
Location: Springfield, Oregon
|
Jimi wrote:HCF wrote:Seems like it would suck to load trucks on the same level with the cab that low. The more photos I've seen of it, the more I've realized that won't be the case. The cab is just as high as it is on a Hitachi EX1200 or Komatsu PC1250 I'm sure cab risers will be an option though. Ah. I think you're right about that. I think I'm having a hard time scaling this machine in my head for some reason.
-Jason YouTubeTimberline Thinning CompanyMy Photostream
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 10/24/2006
Posts: 301
Location: Bunbury,W.Australia
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 11/15/2003
Posts: 1,144
Location: North America
|
Everybody has seen the photos already, and there doesn't seem to be much interest in it. It would have probably attracted more if Caterpillar had put the goofy "new" cab on it?
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 12/27/2003
Posts: 1,628
Location: Australia
|
digggerr wrote:Everybody has seen the photos already, and there doesn't seem to be much interest in it. It would have probably attracted more if Caterpillar had put the goofy "new" cab on it? On what are you baseing your comment on "there doesnt seem to be much interest in it" on?
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 9/13/2006
Posts: 2,508
Location: PA
|
same cab you"d find on a new 300 series hoe.
regards,
Jim
"Once again, concussion by safety" -Mike Rowe
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 10/24/2006
Posts: 301
Location: Bunbury,W.Australia
|
digggerr wrote:Everybody has seen the photos already, and there doesn't seem to be much interest in it. It would have probably attracted more if Caterpillar had put the goofy "new" cab on it? What exactly is the "goofy 'new' cab?" Are you referring to the type utilised on the 6020B?
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 11/15/2003
Posts: 1,144
Location: North America
|
Brian C wrote:digggerr wrote:Everybody has seen the photos already, and there doesn't seem to be much interest in it. It would have probably attracted more if Caterpillar had put the goofy "new" cab on it? What exactly is the "goofy 'new' cab?" Are you referring to the type utilised on the 6020B? That's adept!
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 10/24/2006
Posts: 301
Location: Bunbury,W.Australia
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 9/12/2012
Posts: 484
Location: San Diego, California
|
Wow, that's a really nice machine, sure would look great in 1:50 next to our 5110Bs. Thanks for the updates.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 3/15/2006
Posts: 320
Location: Ontario, CANADA
|
I'll second that as a 1/50 Model update of this machine is way overdue........Looks great from reviewing the specalog. 
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 8/16/2002
Posts: 1,045
Location: montreal canada
|
You should see one next year.... If you read between the lines
Luc.
|
|
|
Guest |
