|  | 
    
    
            
            
	| Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
 
 Joined: 5/11/2009
 Posts: 570
 
 |  | 
|  | 
        
            
            
	|  Rank: Advanced Member
 Groups: Member
 
 Joined: 12/8/2005
 Posts: 708
 Location: Germany
 
 | 
		      scratch building at it´s best! Jan
		 | 
|  | 
        
            
            
	|  Rank: Advanced Member
 Groups: Member
 
 Joined: 6/30/2003
 Posts: 4,920
 Location: Melbourne, Australia
 
 | 
		    Is the 9150 an updated version of the 9100 or a different machine due to it's setup? From what I can see, the 9150 appears to have the boom cylinders inverted like on the larger shovels and perhaps is aimed more at a hard rock application?  That aside, the scratch building is absolutely stunning! I can't wait to see updated images. Thanks for posting!! Rowan.  1:25th scale CAT 375L excavator
   | 
|  | 
        
            
            
	|  Rank: Advanced Member
 Groups: Member
 
 Joined: 6/13/2004
 Posts: 1,506
 Location: Bendigo - Victoria - Australia
 
 | 
		    Rowan,
 Liebherr Mining Machines - R9100 = 100ton Class Machine Etc
 
 Guess they will Re-name the R996 to R9600 one Day
 
 R9100
 R9150
 R9250
 R9350
 R9400
 R995
 R996
 R9800
 
 Regards
 James Muldoon
 From the Land Down Under
 | 
|  | 
        
            
            
	|  Rank: Advanced Member
 Groups: Member
 
 Joined: 6/30/2003
 Posts: 4,920
 Location: Melbourne, Australia
 
 | 
		    I noticed that the 9100 is listed as 108 - 112t and is listed with a smaller bucket. The 9150 as  127 - 130t, I guess there is quite a difference. Rowan. 1:25th scale CAT 375L excavator
   | 
|  | 
        
            
            
	|  Rank: Advanced Member
 Groups: Member
 
 Joined: 7/26/2007
 Posts: 1,134
 Location: Sweden
 
 | 
		    The R9150 is the successor of the R984.
 //Niklas Eriksson
 
 
 | 
|  | 
        
            
            
	| Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
 
 Joined: 5/11/2009
 Posts: 570
 
 | 
		    The R9150 is indeed the successor to the 984.  It looks a lot like the R9100 but it is larger and the boom is very different (six cylinders vs. four on the R9100).  I love the dogbone linkage design on the R9150 - it is mounted on top of the stick rather than through it. Here is the bucket painted - I still have to tidy it up a little and probably apply a coat or two of gloss varnish, but I'm very happy with it.  Next will be the stick!   | 
|  | 
        
            
            
	|  Rank: Advanced Member
 Groups: Member
 
 Joined: 7/2/2007
 Posts: 164
 Location: new york
 
 | 
		    stunning craftsmanship!  watching as the beast develops! Ap40rocktruck Richard Mark
 Owner/ Master Model MakerIndustrial Model Designrick@industrialmodeldesign.comhttp://industrialmodeldesign.com | 
|  | 
        
            
            
	|  Rank: Advanced Member
 Groups: Member
 
 Joined: 7/26/2007
 Posts: 1,134
 Location: Sweden
 
 | 
		    Wow that is incredible!
 //Niklas Eriksson
 
 
 | 
|  | 
        
            
            
	|  Rank: Advanced Member
 Groups: Member
 
 Joined: 2/14/2003
 Posts: 2,353
 Location: Granby,QC,Canada
 
 | 
		    oh la la what a nice project , very well done , I do not understand why you say you can peut more details on 1/32 than 1/50 , I know it is harder when smaller.
 none the less you are a talented person .
 | 
|  | 
        
            
            
	| Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
 
 Joined: 5/11/2009
 Posts: 570
 
 | 
		    Thanks for the kind words everybody.    @towoc99, it is easier to fit more detail into a larger model; I too have seen very detailed 1:87 models but at that scale it becomes impractical and too much work.  I will be making the crawlers from scratch, link by link... never seen that in 1:50 before. ;) Progress-wise, I have spent several hours on the stick and am now at a stage where I can test fit the linkage for the bucket.  This has been extremely difficult to build with just a pencil and a knife, but I'm happy with the progress and looking forward to assembling the cylinders and gooseneck.   | 
|  | 
        
            
            
	|  Rank: Advanced Member
 Groups: Member
 
 Joined: 2/14/2003
 Posts: 2,353
 Location: Granby,QC,Canada
 
 | 
		    agreed that larger scale is easier to put on more details .
 your work is great !
 | 
|  | 
        
            
            
	| Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
 
 Joined: 5/27/2010
 Posts: 1,905
 
 | 
		    Can't believe I missed this post. This excavator is going to be something. Well done.
 
 
 
 
 “A tiger doesn't lose sleep over the opinion of sheep.”  ― Shahir Zag
 
 " An educated mind learns from his mistakes and corrects them. A dolt, on the other hand, lashes out and continues showing his ignorance."
 -Unknown
 
 “Two possibilities exist: either we are alone in the Universe or we are not. Both are equally terrifying.”― Arthur C. Clarke
 
 "Anti-social behavior is a trait of intelligence in a world full of conformists" - Nikola Tesla
 
 " If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur ". Paul Neal "Red" Adair {Wild Well Firefighter for those who live under rocks}
 
 
 
 
 | 
|  | 
        
            
            
	|  Rank: Advanced Member
 Groups: Member
 
 Joined: 10/7/2005
 Posts: 2,495
 Location: Shetland
 
 | 
		    FiatAllisHD41 wrote:Can't believe I missed this post. This excavator is going to be something. Well done.
 Agreed!, and at 1/32 scale quite a size too.  The bucket looks amazing - and that's just the bucket    
 Scania V8.  The best sounding truck in the world.
		 | 
|  | 
        
            
            
	|  Rank: Advanced Member
 Groups: Member
 
 Joined: 7/26/2007
 Posts: 1,134
 Location: Sweden
 
 | 
		    Jim_sparky wrote:Guess they will Re-name the R996 to R9600 one Day Acually, the 996 is closer to 700tons than 600tons. Wouldnt be surprised that it will be called 9650. 
 //Niklas Eriksson
		 | 
|  | 
        
            
            
	| Rank: Member Groups: Member
 
 Joined: 7/23/2007
 Posts: 44
 
 | 
		    very nice!
		 | 
|  | 
        
            
            
	|  Rank: Advanced Member
 Groups: Member
 
 Joined: 6/27/2007
 Posts: 2,647
 Location: Fort McMurray, Alberta
 
 | 
		    Beautiful work so far!  This is going to be a nice build to watch. Tarantula wrote:Acually, the 996 is closer to 700tons than 600tons. Wouldnt be surprised that it will be called 9650. I'd actually expect the number of the new machine to be the 9700.  What I am curious about, is whether the new machine will retain a right hand cab, or progress to the left hand cab as all of their new models have.
		 | 
|  | 
        
            
            
	|  Rank: Advanced Member
 Groups: Member
 
 Joined: 7/26/2007
 Posts: 1,134
 Location: Sweden
 
 | 
		    Yes that is a possibility, after all the 996B weighs about 670tons. Maybe this means that Liebherr will intruduce a model between the 995 (9450?) and 996B (9700?)? Quite a gap between the 995 and 996 at the moment. 
 //Niklas Eriksson
 
 
 | 
|  | 
        
            
            
	| Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
 
 Joined: 6/26/2006
 Posts: 163
 Location: Mt.Carmel,Pa. 17851
 
 | 
		    Hey Davie82,  impresive quality.  Question, how are you doing this, 3-D printing, CNC, or hand work?
		 | 
|  | 
        
            
            
	|  Rank: Advanced Member
 Groups: Member
 
 Joined: 10/24/2006
 Posts: 301
 Location: Bunbury,W.Australia
 
 | 
		    Hey Davie82 That is the start of something very unique and I must say I am jealous of your workmanship!! Nice one mate! Don't be surprised if the guys from the Liebherr factory in Colmar offer you a handsome sum of $$$ for this model. That bucket is an exact replica of the actual one on the unit exhibited at Minexpo last year.Looking forward to the build progress. Brian C   | 
|  | 
        
    
    
| Guest |