|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 5/19/2014 Posts: 216 Location: Ontario Canada
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 4/13/2011 Posts: 1,021 Location: California
|
Ho no. A forum member showed here this crane a while back and it was almost to its max on boom if i can remember it had 500 ft + of boom with no derric. What a mess. SOMETHING IS BETTER THAN NOTHING. http://s1185.photobucket.com/home/vipyfz2008/indexhttp://www.youtube.com/user/vipyfz?feature=mheeluis.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 3/17/2006 Posts: 1,169 Location: NJ
|
Yep. Bad situation there. Went completely over backward.
We rally round the family, with a pocket full of shells.....
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 1/11/2007 Posts: 9,004 Location: Lincolnshire
|
JoeE wrote:Yep. Bad situation there. Went completely over backward.
Didn't go backwards at all. http://www.nbcnews.com/video/horrifying-nyc-crane-collapse-caught-on-camera-616920643917Paul R
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 3/17/2006 Posts: 1,169 Location: NJ
|
Wow Over forward. Wtf We rally round the family, with a pocket full of shells.....
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 2/14/2014 Posts: 151 Location: Dallas
|
I think that crane was relatively new to. Sad to see a big Liebherr like that
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 2/3/2015 Posts: 643 Location: New Hampshire
|
I am amazed that a company like Bay Crane would allow something like this to happen. Thoughts and prayers for anyone involved.
- Kyle
|
|
Rank: Newbie Groups: Member
Joined: 4/23/2014 Posts: 4
|
I don't know that much about crane operations but would the weather have caused that? I find it hard to believe that a couple of inches of snow would cause such a catostrophic failure. http://www.twitter.com/samcat116
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 2/3/2015 Posts: 643 Location: New Hampshire
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 2/3/2015 Posts: 643 Location: New Hampshire
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 2/22/2008 Posts: 213 Location: Columbia, MD
|
A very very unfortunate situation, especially as a person lost a life in this terrible accident. It seemed to me, that the crane was being walked, perhaps down the timber ramp. If this was the case, it was a VERY risky move with that much boom high in the air. Was there also wind loads on the back of the boom at the time? A thorough investigation will surely follow. The leverage imposed by the falling boom was enough to actually flip over the house, and crawler undercarriage. Sad indeed, and yet, it could have been so much worse. The falling boom could have very well fall upon other people or the adjacent buildings.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 6/27/2007 Posts: 1,489 Location: St. Louis, Missouri, USA
|
It seems as though the boom and jib were raised yesterday, and with the weather getting bad (high winds), they were being lowered. From the pictures, there was probably a little added weight from the wet snow, and if the wind was blowing from behind the crane, there could have been enough moment to have caused the overturning. Just my opinion, of course, and the facts will emerge from the official investigations. Terrible and tragic for the fatality and injuries. Something must have led those guys to be recording the crane. Those noises (not the beeps) were pretty unsettling.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 9/22/2007 Posts: 5,860 Location: Louisville
|
Very sad, looks to me he was trying to boom down, didn't have the main raised to a the certain angle before he can start laying the jib down, maybe tried to lay all 565ft down at once. Which is a no no. Wind probably helped also. But the main should have been up to around 80 degrees or more before attempting to jackknife the jib.
Brandon my youtube channelMy Facebook Page
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 2/3/2015 Posts: 643 Location: New Hampshire
|
It was said in the news reporting that they were given permission to erect the boom to max length yesterday and they were in the process of securing the boom when the accident happened. I would assume that means lowering it because I cannot see a safe way to secure this boom while raised.
- Kyle
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 11/10/2010 Posts: 452 Location: Borden SK Canada
|
KyleS wrote:It was said in the news reporting that they were given permission to erect the boom to max length yesterday and they were in the process of securing the boom when the accident happened. I would assume that means lowering it because I cannot see a safe way to secure this boom while raised. There are ways in securing booms with high winds. That is by main boom up, jib head touching the ground. It is the same way they have to erect the boom, according to liebherrs technical data sheet.
Mammoet- Size does Matter. Dafgek
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 6/27/2007 Posts: 1,489 Location: St. Louis, Missouri, USA
|
DafgekCanada wrote:KyleS wrote:It was said in the news reporting that they were given permission to erect the boom to max length yesterday and they were in the process of securing the boom when the accident happened. I would assume that means lowering it because I cannot see a safe way to secure this boom while raised. There are ways in securing booms with high winds. That is by main boom up, jib head touching the ground. It is the same way they have to erect the boom, according to liebherrs technical data sheet. I think this is all true; the boom doesn't have to lay flat to be secure; it just has to have the jib tip on the ground. As cookie guys know from booming up our models, what Brandon said is also accurate.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 11/10/2010 Posts: 452 Location: Borden SK Canada
|
KyleS wrote:I am amazed that a company like Bay Crane would allow something like this to happen. Thoughts and prayers for anyone involved. According to vertikals article, bay crane rented out this crane to Galasso Trucking and Rigging ( http://www.vertikal.net/en/news/story/24797/) So basically The crane is from Bay Crane, and operated by a different company. which could lead to inexperience operator.
Mammoet- Size does Matter. Dafgek
|
|
Rank: Member Groups: Member
Joined: 10/25/2006 Posts: 20 Location: edmonton,alberta
|
Hi all,it looks like a LR-1300 I'm no crane operator but I know even when you have that much boom on a crane even in 1-50 scale she is very tipsy unless you have the Derrick and ballast on the back a very sad tradegy
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 9/16/2007 Posts: 2,707 Location: Staten Island, New York
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 3/23/2010 Posts: 701 Location: Washington, DC
|
Yes, my thoughts are with those injured and the families of those killed and injured. Likewise my thoughts are with the operator, involved staff and owners of the involved companies.
I watched and read the various releases during the day. The crane is confirmed as a 330 US ton Liebherr LR 1300. It was in maximum boom configuration, luffing, totaling 564 (Liebherr web site) or 565 feet (released length) and was inspected by the city yesterday when placed in that configuration. The crane was being secured at the time of the collapse. The boom collapsed forward with the main boom boomed well up. That position was sufficiently vertical to flip the house, carbody and tracks upside down on top of the boom foot. Note, the drives on the crawler started facing rearward providing additional rear weight but are now facing forward and the carbody is upside down. The house followed the boom indicating that the boom was intact sufficiently to act as a 564 foot lever. The timber mats clear of snow behind where the crane came to rest would indicate that it had not been walked from its original position. The ownership of the machine and the company with operational responsibility were publicly released and the former is visible in some photos. The timber base appears to remain in position.
The logging electronics on the machine may be key to determining what happened. The weather forecast called for 15 to 18 mile per hour wind per published reports. Likewise the crane's owner is reported to have a policy that the crane be secured at 20 miles per hour. The reported maximum wind load per the manufacturer is 25 miles per hour. Gusts were reported as high as 29 miles per hour. If one of those gusts hit when attempting to boom the luffing boom down, it could thrown the boom out of chart relative to the crane's machinery deck and lower structure. The boom angles and wind speed as logged will verify this. If so, this is a true act of god while the various personnel on the ground were attempting to clear people and space to land the luffing boom. The photos seemingly support such a finding, but again the machines logging devices will help determine what happened.
|
|
Guest |