|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 8/11/2008 Posts: 105 Location: Staten Island, NY
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 3/23/2010 Posts: 701 Location: Washington, DC
|
The recently introducted LTM1350-6.1s are starting to make their appearances. First we had Digging and Rigging at Conexpo and now Bay Crane. Looks as if this may be a popular machine with several of Liebherr's larger accounts.
I hope shortly to be looking at a new LTM1400-7.1 in its initial set up.
It has definitely been a good year for some Liebherr sales staff.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 9/22/2007 Posts: 5,860 Location: Louisville
|
Awesome shots! great looking rig.
Brandon my youtube channelMy Facebook Page
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 1/11/2007 Posts: 9,004 Location: Lincolnshire
|
Some great photos there. The LTM 1350-6.1 is a nice looking machine and is fasting becoming one of my "I wish this was a model" favorites. Bay Crane also has to be one of the best looking US liveries I think.
Paul R
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 9/7/2005 Posts: 1,150 Location: Copake, NY
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 6/4/2006 Posts: 7,744 Location: arlington, Tx
|
It sure would make a sweet model Awesome pics Jason
Nikl Scale Models nikl scale models shapeways store
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 10/2/2007 Posts: 5,966
|
now thats a beautiful crane, great livery and very clean looking.... i too would like to see a model of this and in this company would be even better!
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 4/11/2008 Posts: 1,605 Location: North Wales
|
I'm with Paul on this crane, it is a very very good crane, will be a best seller for Liebherr I think. Bronzesheild or the only Uk company to own one at the moment but I reckon that will soon change....I've even heard we've looked at it. DC Craneman wrote: I hope shortly to be looking at a new LTM1500-7.1 in its initial set up
1500 7.1! Not heard that one and can't see it, the 500 is massively heavy for it's 8 axles with most countries unable to move it with it's full boom and y guy on board as it is. That being said in the US a lot of states have to remove the boom so the 8 axles is a bit of a overkill so maybe a 500 7.1 unable to travel with the boom could be a good move from Liebherr but I've not heard anything. I'm more stoked about the LTM1750 9.1, this crane is far closer to putting in a appearance than people believe.....and it's a cracker, Ainscough have turned there eyes from the troublesome AC1000 and have them straight on this new 750 Liebherr. Gaz
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 10/2/2007 Posts: 5,966
|
why dont Ainscough just get the LTM 11200 at this point, it doesnt make sense that they would go from a 1000t machine down to a 750t machine when they could get a 1200t machine instead
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 10/29/2010 Posts: 1,916 Location: Maine U.S.A
|
This is one nice crane, I love the colors. A model would be sick. You think they have Bay Crane stamped on it enough?
-Mike
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 6/5/2007 Posts: 2,760 Location: Sarasota, Florida, USA
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 11/10/2010 Posts: 452 Location: Borden SK Canada
|
Paul R wrote:Some great photos there. The LTM 1350-6.1 is a nice looking machine and is fasting becoming one of my "I wish this was a model" favorites. Bay Crane also has to be one of the best looking US liveries I think.
Paul R Paul, there is word that WSI will produce the LTM1350-6.1 in a model. It probly come out next year. Yeah this crane is amazing i only wish MAMMOET has one, then it will make my day.
Mammoet- Size does Matter. Dafgek
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 6/4/2006 Posts: 7,744 Location: arlington, Tx
|
Quote:I'm more stoked about the LTM1750 9.1, this crane is far closer to putting in a appearance than people believe.....and it's a cracker, Ainscough have turned there eyes from the troublesome AC1000 and have them straight on this new 750 Liebherr.
Maybe they are waiting to move you up to the new big crane? I have to agree with you the LTM 1750 is going to be a sweet rig when it does come out. Shoot Liebherr will probably bring it out before we seee Terex's AC1000 Jason
Nikl Scale Models nikl scale models shapeways store
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 1/11/2007 Posts: 9,004 Location: Lincolnshire
|
DafgekCanada wrote:
Paul, there is word that WSI will produce the LTM1350-6.1 in a model. It probly come out next year.
Yeah this crane is amazing i only wish MAMMOET has one, then it will make my day.
If there is any truth to that, then I'll pre-order all liveries right now! (Disclaimer - only if I like the livery ) Paul R
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 11/11/2006 Posts: 3,421 Location: UK
|
DeWoc19 wrote:why dont Ainscough just get the LTM 11200 at this point, it doesnt make sense that they would go from a 1000t machine down to a 750t machine when they could get a 1200t machine instead Well, It does make sense. From the sense that the 750 will more than likely be boom on. 1200 isnt. Transport cost Im sure I saw gaz say that it cost 6 million in transport to move the 2800 and 1550. Thats a huge cost. The 750s ballast will probably need half as many trucks. I think I also read Gaz say, Yes I do alot of reading , That they still might be getting an AC 1000, aswell as maybe a 750??? am I true? Heavy Cranes
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 4/11/2008 Posts: 1,605 Location: North Wales
|
Jack. wrote:Im sure I saw gaz say that it cost 6 million in transport to move the 2800 and 1550. Thats a huge cost. I think I also read Gaz say, Yes I do alot of reading , That they still might be getting an AC 1000, aswell as maybe a 750??? am I true? The Job that used both the TC2800 & LG1550 was up in Lowastoft and cost 60k in transport to get the 2 cranes there, 3 days to rig, 2 days to lift and 3 days to de-rig. At the moment the AC1000 is due, as well as the LTM1750 depending on work etc, heavy cranes are quite at the moment so they will not invest on cranes to have them standing. Word on the ground is they have a lot of work lined up for the end of the year and next year, just in time for 2 new giant machines . Dewoc, the reason Ainscough do not have a LTM11200 is quite simple, the LG1550 was chosen instead. The reason for this is the LG is simply a much better crane for the market here in the UK. The LG is a much more versatile crane, and was cheaper to buy. The heavy lift side of things the LG walks all over the 112, so it can be used for heavy industrial use of loads of hundreds of tons but you can also stitch in more lattice work to make a boom length longer than the 112 with duties to match. Yes the 112 has certain advantages, speed of rigging and space needed to rig is smaller but the LG's advantages out weigh them, it is a crane that can be used for just about anything...and its nearly a 20 year old design. Now the LG1550/LTM1800 has been discontinued I'm surprised another similar crane has not been introduced, the advantages of this machine are obvious. WSI for the LTM1350, happy days.....must admit though i would love to see a LTM1150 6.1 in model form......can't ever think why Gaz
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 11/11/2006 Posts: 3,421 Location: UK
|
Now, theres the reason I thought 6 million was a tiny bit dear................................................... At least I got the six part ........... Heavy Cranes
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 8/24/2006 Posts: 2,185 Location: Grapevine, Tx
|
DeWoc19 wrote:now thats a beautiful crane, great livery and very clean looking.... i too would like to see a model of this and in this company would be even better! I can't agree more Jeff
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 6/13/2004 Posts: 1,506 Location: Bendigo - Victoria - Australia
|
Guys,
Have Liebherr gone to standard Counter Weights.Are the LTM1350 & LTM11200 using same Counter Weights
Gaz is it correct that the LTM11200 was really only design for Wind Farm work? Is there any idea of a Release date for the AC1000?
Regards James Muldoon From the Land Down Under
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 3/23/2010 Posts: 701 Location: Washington, DC
|
I suspect that over the next few years we shall see more of these around here. The 350 to 365 US ton class or 300 US ton class are the current big machines in many of the rental fleets. Tonnage creep is always present in the cookie world. I would suspect that at least two more companies and maybe three long term may purchase it.
I've suspected that the LTM1750-9.1 was close to delivery. I've also heard rumor that a local company has one on order for 2012 delivery. The finality of that will probably be determine by how roadable it is in this region. They also traded in an LTM11200 position I understand, but could not road it around here. This is also why the telescopic boom for the Anthony/ Maxim machine was returned.
With the Terex AC700 discontinued and the AC1000/9 long delayed though the TC2800 is available and both the Liebherr LTM1750-9.1 soon to be available and the LG1750 available, it will be interesting to see what wins out in the large mobile class. At the greater radius, a latice boom machine will outdo a telescopic boom machine of the same capacity and likewise you can generally add more reach to a lattice machine than a given telescopic of the same capacity. Hence Gaz is corrrect. You are balancing labor costs of mobilization versus mobility versus utility and demand in any given market when purchasing a machine. It is also rumored that the LTM1750 will be more along the design lines of the LTM1500 than the LTM11200
The LTM1350 may well become a future workhorse of many daily rental hosues and may be even become more popular than the discontinued LTM1300. The bulk of the US AT market is in the five and six axle cranes. Only a few large cities, the power industry and the petrochemical industry really demand anything much larger. In the larger cities, it is reach and radius that drive the capacity as opposed to weight of the loads usually handled.
|
|
Guest |