|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 9/4/2007 Posts: 156
|
HEY GUYS I've got plans for creating a 800 ton mining truck and 4000 ton mining truck to release to the surface mining industry
|
|
![](/resource.ashx?u=102887) Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 7/26/2007 Posts: 1,134 Location: Sweden
|
And santa would be the companys vice president?
//Niklas Eriksson
|
|
![](/resource.ashx?u=103185) Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 2/26/2008 Posts: 1,765 Location: Virginia
|
Let's see em
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 8/5/2006 Posts: 5,095
|
|
|
![](/resource.ashx?u=102909) Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 8/23/2007 Posts: 2,639 Location: Pennsylvania
|
D5G wrote:how old are you? seriously a 4000 ton truck, what a joke. This is beyond a joke man! If I remember, he said he was 9 or something around there.
-Justin "Everyone's Goal Is To Mine More Coal!"PAmining http://www.youtube.com/user/PAmining
|
|
![](/resource.ashx?u=102790) Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 7/2/2007 Posts: 164 Location: new york
|
Even the 800 ton capacity seems far fetched. unless someone has developed a transoprter beam.... simply put, how many cubic yards in one ton of overburden? multiply that by 800, and we have a volume by which we need to transport. Perhaps several prime movers & a train of trailers, from the land down under. 4000 tons exceeds that of a very long train. ap40rocktruck Richard MarkOwner/ Master Model Maker Industrial Model Designrick@industrialmodeldesign.comhttp://industrialmodeldesign.com
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 9/4/2007 Posts: 156
|
i'm 15 and a 500 ton truck would be possible
|
|
![](/resource.ashx?u=96287) Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 6/27/2007 Posts: 2,647 Location: Fort McMurray, Alberta
|
MININGEXCAVATORS wrote:i'm 15 and a 500 ton truck would be possible The only problem with that is that you never mentioned a 500 ton truck, only an 800 and 4000 ton trucks. Brian
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 8/5/2006 Posts: 5,095
|
Greasemonkey wrote:The only problem with that is that you never mentioned a 500 ton truck, only an 800 and 4000 ton trucks. Exactly. MikesModels2011 on FacebookMikesModels2011 on YouTubeMikes Model Reviews ThreadMack Granite Project Thread
|
|
![](/resource.ashx?u=102902) Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 8/12/2007 Posts: 2,099 Location: Raleigh, NC
|
D5G wrote:how old are you? seriously a 4000 ton truck, what a joke. let's just do a little figuring here. let's say that it's nice and dry light dirt that weighs about 2000lbs per yard (1 ton). So we would have to have a truck that is able to carry 4000 yards of dirt. Rembember a yard is a 3'x3' cube or 27 cubic feet. so 4000 sq. yards would make for a dump bed that about the size of a cruise ship. Your average quad axle dump truck can carry about 20 tons, so roughly 15 yards of clay material(heaped) and that's with a bed that's 8' wide and 15' long with 5' sides. isn't that largest haul truck around 400 tons? or is it less than that.
Chris To see our equipment in action: http://ca.youtube.com/user/letsdig18
|
|
![](/resource.ashx?u=92762) Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 6/11/2007 Posts: 1,528 Location: Indiana
|
Dirtman2007 wrote:D5G wrote:how old are you? seriously a 4000 ton truck, what a joke. let's just do a little figuring here. let's say that it's nice and dry light dirt that weighs about 2000lbs per yard (1 ton). So we would have to have a truck that is able to carry 4000 yards of dirt. Rembember a yard is a 3'x3' cube or 27 cubic feet. so 4000 sq. yards would make for a dump bed that about the size of a cruise ship. Your average quad axle dump truck can carry about 20 tons, so roughly 15 yards of clay material(heaped) and that's with a bed that's 8' wide and 15' long with 5' sides. isn't that largest haul truck around 400 tons? or is it less than that. Heh, exaggerate much? 4000 CY would be a cube 48.6' in each dimension. Hardly, the size of a cruise ship. What would load a 4000 ton truck? It'd take a large dragline about 45 minutes to load it. - Alex
|
|
![](/resource.ashx?u=102902) Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 8/12/2007 Posts: 2,099 Location: Raleigh, NC
|
Redjack Ryan wrote:Dirtman2007 wrote:D5G wrote:how old are you? seriously a 4000 ton truck, what a joke. let's just do a little figuring here. let's say that it's nice and dry light dirt that weighs about 2000lbs per yard (1 ton). So we would have to have a truck that is able to carry 4000 yards of dirt. Rembember a yard is a 3'x3' cube or 27 cubic feet. so 4000 sq. yards would make for a dump bed that about the size of a cruise ship. Your average quad axle dump truck can carry about 20 tons, so roughly 15 yards of clay material(heaped) and that's with a bed that's 8' wide and 15' long with 5' sides. isn't that largest haul truck around 400 tons? or is it less than that. Heh, exaggerate much? 4000 CY would be a cube 48.6' in each dimension. Hardly, the size of a cruise ship. What would load a 4000 ton truck? It'd take a large dragline about 45 minutes to load it. - Alex well that about the size of a cruise ship I could afford to ride on Didn't do the math, but 3500-4000 yards of dirt is a rather large pile a dirt.
Chris To see our equipment in action: http://ca.youtube.com/user/letsdig18
|
|
![](/resource.ashx?u=99091) Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 10/11/2006 Posts: 1,498 Location: Rexford Montana & Sparwood BC
|
Believe me if they could build a 800 ton mining truck, the big Mining corporations would have them. Tires are the only thing holding the haul truck sizes down. 4000 toner thats kinda funny ![Teeth](/images/emoticons/msp_biggrin.gif) ,but I bet 30 years ago they thought the same thing about 400 toners.
IF YOU LOVE WHAT YOU DO, YOU DON'T HAVE TO WORK A DAY IN YOUR LIFE...
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 12/4/2004 Posts: 3,241 Location: Saratoga Springs,NY
|
How big are the tires and how many?In realiy a 425,450 ton hauler might be reachable
|
|
![](/resource.ashx?u=92762) Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 6/11/2007 Posts: 1,528 Location: Indiana
|
797's and 282's already carry 400+ tons, and probably have already had that much or more loaded on them.
|
|
![](/resource.ashx?u=96031) Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 2/18/2007 Posts: 4,116 Location: Wayne, NewJersey
|
I love it when the fluids get pumpin' on stuff like this. Good work, Forum brains.
Chris, Don't listen to them. Your Takeuchi and the Volvo can handle a pile of ANYTHING the size of a cruise ship !
- Danny
|
|
![](/resource.ashx?u=101350) Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 5/27/2007 Posts: 2,757 Location: Mansfield/Ft. Worth, Texas
|
And the love Gurus flying carpet can haul it...... =) Jake
"Building the future!"
|
|
![](/resource.ashx?u=99999) Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 1/6/2007 Posts: 1,306 Location: Morenci, AZ
|
Considering that we already have to just about sell our souls to keep a decent stock of 793 tires (46.00R57) around, and the 797's aren't much easier, I don't see a mad rush to make a bigger tire for a bigger truck.
All that aside, there's no loading machines big enough to make anything beyond 400 (nominal) tons very efficient - the shorter the load time, the more time the trucks spend moving. Idle time is a bad thing in mining - we don't really like seeing over 1.5 minutes under the shovel, and prefer around a 1.0 dig rate.
I like the imagineering, and thinking ahead, but in reality, trucks are the least efficient part of the mining process - especially as pits get deeper and hauls get longer. It takes more trucks to keep up with the processing side for every bench the mine goes deeper, eventually haulage costs will cause a move away from perfectly good orebodies or coal seams to closer diggings. The future lies in conveyor systems for older, deeper mines, and a return to rail based systems for the new ones.
|
|
![](/resource.ashx?u=92454) Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 7/31/2005 Posts: 5,487 Location: Breisach, Black Forest, Germany
|
a 4000 ton truck huh?
put a huge fixed dump bed on SPMTs and dump them with a lift platform, like those woodships rigs
ok, speed is low, but hey you move 4000 tons in one go, so you as long as you´re not more than ten times slower than a 797, you gain time
oh, and load it with BWE293... 240.000 tons output anyone?
that said, who would want to ruin himself on such a setup when conveyor belts are cheap
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 6/24/2005 Posts: 1,167 Location: London
|
Tyres aren't the only problem for an 800 ton truck (let alone a 4000 tonner) as a suitable engine would also be unavailable. There's also the question of how to load it.
|
|
Guest |