DHS Diecast Discussion Forum
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Members | Log In

LARGE MINING TRUCK PLANS Options · View
zzzz DELETED 102917
Posted: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 7:21:06 PM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 9/4/2007
Posts: 156
HEY GUYS I've got plans for creating a 800 ton mining truck and 4000 ton mining truck to release to the surface mining industry
Tarantula
Posted: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 7:24:29 PM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/26/2007
Posts: 1,134
Location: Sweden
And santa would be the companys vice president?

//Niklas Eriksson

CarlBrutanananadilewski
Posted: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 8:03:08 PM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 2/26/2008
Posts: 1,765
Location: Virginia
Let's see em
D5G
Posted: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 9:58:46 PM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 8/5/2006
Posts: 5,095
JustinE
Posted: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 10:13:38 PM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 8/23/2007
Posts: 2,639
Location: Pennsylvania
D5G wrote:
how old are you? seriously a 4000 ton truck, what a joke.

This is beyond a joke man! If I remember, he said he was 9 or something around there.

-Justin

"Everyone's Goal Is To Mine More Coal!"
PAmining
http://www.youtube.com/user/PAmining
ap40rocktruck
Posted: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 10:16:35 PM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/2/2007
Posts: 164
Location: new york
Even the 800 ton capacity seems far fetched. unless someone has developed a transoprter beam....

simply put, how many cubic yards in one ton of overburden? multiply that by 800, and we have a volume by which we need to transport.

Perhaps several prime movers & a train of trailers, from the land down under. 4000 tons exceeds that of a very long train.

ap40rocktruck

Richard Mark
Owner/ Master Model Maker
Industrial Model Design
rick@industrialmodeldesign.com
http://industrialmodeldesign.com
zzzz DELETED 102917
Posted: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 11:22:02 PM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 9/4/2007
Posts: 156
i'm 15 and a 500 ton truck would be possible
Greasemonkey
Posted: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 11:38:11 PM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/27/2007
Posts: 2,647
Location: Fort McMurray, Alberta
MININGEXCAVATORS wrote:
i'm 15 and a 500 ton truck would be possible


The only problem with that is that you never mentioned a 500 ton truck, only an 800 and 4000 ton trucks.

Brian
D5G
Posted: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 11:43:37 PM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 8/5/2006
Posts: 5,095
Greasemonkey wrote:
The only problem with that is that you never mentioned a 500 ton truck, only an 800 and 4000 ton trucks.


Exactly.

MikesModels2011 on Facebook

MikesModels2011 on YouTube

Mikes Model Reviews Thread

Mack Granite Project Thread
Dirtman2007
Posted: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 12:08:39 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 8/12/2007
Posts: 2,099
Location: Raleigh, NC
D5G wrote:
how old are you? seriously a 4000 ton truck, what a joke.


let's just do a little figuring here. let's say that it's nice and dry light dirt that weighs about 2000lbs per yard (1 ton). So we would have to have a truck that is able to carry 4000 yards of dirt. Rembember a yard is a 3'x3' cube or 27 cubic feet. so 4000 sq. yards would make for a dump bed that about the size of a cruise ship. Your average quad axle dump truck can carry about 20 tons, so roughly 15 yards of clay material(heaped) and that's with a bed that's 8' wide and 15' long with 5' sides.

isn't that largest haul truck around 400 tons? or is it less than that.

Chris


To see our equipment in action:

http://ca.youtube.com/user/letsdig18
Redjack Ryan
Posted: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 12:21:52 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/11/2007
Posts: 1,527
Location: Indiana
Dirtman2007 wrote:
D5G wrote:
how old are you? seriously a 4000 ton truck, what a joke.


let's just do a little figuring here. let's say that it's nice and dry light dirt that weighs about 2000lbs per yard (1 ton). So we would have to have a truck that is able to carry 4000 yards of dirt. Rembember a yard is a 3'x3' cube or 27 cubic feet. so 4000 sq. yards would make for a dump bed that about the size of a cruise ship. Your average quad axle dump truck can carry about 20 tons, so roughly 15 yards of clay material(heaped) and that's with a bed that's 8' wide and 15' long with 5' sides.

isn't that largest haul truck around 400 tons? or is it less than that.


Heh, exaggerate much? 4000 CY would be a cube 48.6' in each dimension. Hardly, the size of a cruise ship.

What would load a 4000 ton truck? It'd take a large dragline about 45 minutes to load it.

- Alex
Dirtman2007
Posted: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 12:26:10 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 8/12/2007
Posts: 2,099
Location: Raleigh, NC
Redjack Ryan wrote:
Dirtman2007 wrote:
D5G wrote:
how old are you? seriously a 4000 ton truck, what a joke.


let's just do a little figuring here. let's say that it's nice and dry light dirt that weighs about 2000lbs per yard (1 ton). So we would have to have a truck that is able to carry 4000 yards of dirt. Rembember a yard is a 3'x3' cube or 27 cubic feet. so 4000 sq. yards would make for a dump bed that about the size of a cruise ship. Your average quad axle dump truck can carry about 20 tons, so roughly 15 yards of clay material(heaped) and that's with a bed that's 8' wide and 15' long with 5' sides.

isn't that largest haul truck around 400 tons? or is it less than that.


Heh, exaggerate much? 4000 CY would be a cube 48.6' in each dimension. Hardly, the size of a cruise ship.

What would load a 4000 ton truck? It'd take a large dragline about 45 minutes to load it.

- Alex


well that about the size of a cruise ship I could afford to ride onTeeth

Didn't do the math, but 3500-4000 yards of dirt is a rather large pile a dirt.

Chris


To see our equipment in action:

http://ca.youtube.com/user/letsdig18
TomCat
Posted: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 12:40:53 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 10/11/2006
Posts: 1,498
Location: Rexford Montana & Sparwood BC
Believe me if they could build a 800 ton mining truck, the big Mining corporations would have them. Tires are the only thing holding the haul truck sizes down. 4000 toner thats kinda funnyTeeth ,but I bet 30 years ago they thought the same thing about 400 toners.

IF YOU LOVE WHAT YOU DO, YOU DON'T HAVE TO WORK A DAY IN YOUR LIFE...
JD544
Posted: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 12:42:21 AM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/4/2004
Posts: 3,241
Location: Saratoga Springs,NY
How big are the tires and how many?In realiy a 425,450 ton hauler might be reachable
Redjack Ryan
Posted: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 12:57:11 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/11/2007
Posts: 1,527
Location: Indiana
797's and 282's already carry 400+ tons, and probably have already had that much or more loaded on them.
Lil' Danny
Posted: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 1:23:36 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 2/18/2007
Posts: 4,116
Location: Wayne, NewJersey
I love it when the fluids get pumpin' on stuff like this. Good work, Forum brains.

Chris, Don't listen to them. Your Takeuchi and the Volvo can handle a pile of ANYTHING the size of a cruise ship !

- Danny


ManitowocMan
Posted: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 1:25:35 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 5/27/2007
Posts: 2,757
Location: Mansfield/Ft. Worth, Texas
And the love Gurus flying carpet can haul it......

=)

Jake


"Building the future!"
D10N
Posted: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 5:49:30 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/6/2007
Posts: 1,306
Location: Morenci, AZ
Considering that we already have to just about sell our souls to keep a decent stock of 793 tires (46.00R57) around, and the 797's aren't much easier, I don't see a mad rush to make a bigger tire for a bigger truck.

All that aside, there's no loading machines big enough to make anything beyond 400 (nominal) tons very efficient - the shorter the load time, the more time the trucks spend moving. Idle time is a bad thing in mining - we don't really like seeing over 1.5 minutes under the shovel, and prefer around a 1.0 dig rate.

I like the imagineering, and thinking ahead, but in reality, trucks are the least efficient part of the mining process - especially as pits get deeper and hauls get longer. It takes more trucks to keep up with the processing side for every bench the mine goes deeper, eventually haulage costs will cause a move away from perfectly good orebodies or coal seams to closer diggings. The future lies in conveyor systems for older, deeper mines, and a return to rail based systems for the new ones.
Christian
Posted: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 6:19:12 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/31/2005
Posts: 5,487
Location: Breisach, Black Forest, Germany
a 4000 ton truck huh?

put a huge fixed dump bed on SPMTs and dump them with a lift platform, like those woodships rigs

ok, speed is low, but hey you move 4000 tons in one go, so you as long as you´re not more than ten times slower than a 797, you gain time

oh, and load it with BWE293... 240.000 tons output anyone?

that said, who would want to ruin himself on such a setup when conveyor belts are cheap





MJW
Posted: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 6:26:10 AM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/24/2005
Posts: 1,167
Location: London
Tyres aren't the only problem for an 800 ton truck (let alone a 4000 tonner) as a suitable engine would also be unavailable. There's also the question of how to load it.
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

SoClean Theme Created by Jaben Cargman (Tiny Gecko)
Powered by Yet Another Forum.net version 1.9.1.8 (NET v2.0) - 3/29/2008
Copyright © 2003-2008 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.